A view of what your catalog is worth as an asset, built from your actual royalty data rather than from a questionnaire. It shows a total catalog value, how that value splits between publishing rights and sound recordings, which platforms your revenue comes from, your top songs ranked by individual value, and the factors moving the number. It is included with Mogul Register.

From your connected royalty data, using industry-standard multiples applied to your actual earnings and performance. Catalog buyers price catalogs on a multiple of earnings, adjusted for how stable and how recent those earnings are, and the Valuation Center applies that same logic to your numbers. The accuracy of the output depends on how much of your catalog is connected, so a partially connected catalog produces a partial picture.

No. It is an estimate based on your earnings data and standard market multiples, not an offer and not a confirmed market price. A real sale price depends on the buyer, the deal structure, what rights are included, and what the market looks like at the time. Treat the number as a starting point for a conversation, not a figure to negotiate against as if it were settled.

How your value splits between the publishing side and the recording side. This matters more than most artists expect. If nearly all of your value sits on one side, it usually means the other side is either genuinely small or not registered and collecting properly. Seeing a lopsided split is often the first sign of a registration problem rather than a creative one.

Because catalog value is usually concentrated in a handful of tracks. The Valuation Center ranks your top ten songs by individual valuation and shows revenue, growth rate, and each song's share of your total. That tells you which tracks are carrying the catalog, which is useful for deciding where to focus registration work, sync pitching, and any conversation about a partial catalog deal.

Concentration risk is how much of your value depends on a small number of songs or a single platform. A catalog where one track drives most of the revenue is worth less per dollar of earnings than one where revenue is spread out, because a buyer is exposed to that track declining. The Valuation Center surfaces it alongside catalog age, total track count, and year-over-year growth, so you can see what a buyer or a lender would see.

The Valuation Center can connect you with financing partners who offer advances based on your catalog valuation. Whether financing is offered, on what terms, and for how much is the financing partner's decision, not Mogul's, and it depends on your catalog and their criteria. Mogul provides the valuation and the introduction. It does not lend and does not set the terms.

No, and most people who run a valuation are not selling. The common uses are getting an advance without selling, knowing your number before a label, publisher, or investor conversation, giving a manager or business manager concrete figures to work with, evaluating whether a sync or partnership offer is fair, and tracking how value moves as you release. Knowing the number is useful precisely when you are not selling.

The valuation reflects what it can see. Missing sources mean missing revenue, which means a lower and less reliable number. Uncollected royalties sitting with a society do not show up as earnings, so an unregistered catalog will usually value lower than it should. Running the registration side first tends to change the valuation, which is why the two work together.

Yes, and it is often more useful on that side. A manager negotiating a deal or a business manager planning around a client's income needs a defensible number rather than a feel for it. The Valuation Center gives a figure tied to actual royalty data, with the asset breakdown and concentration factors behind it, so the conversation starts from evidence.